Disproving the Laws of Thermodynamics |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )
Welcome to ThoughtVent, a free community where you can talk to your peers about whatever you want. Using the site is easy and fun. Once registered, simply click on the category that fits your topic and click on the New Topic button to start talking with our other members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.
Click here to Register!
![]() ![]() |
Disproving the Laws of Thermodynamics |
Sep 21 2007, 02:40 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Advanced Venter ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 13-August 07 From: NEO Member No.: 14 |
I was having a heated "debate" with a friend the other about the laws of thermodynamics. She kept stating that they always work therefore there is no one experiment needed to prove they work all the time. Then she started getting into the "if the opposite doesn't hold true, therefore it must work." Which I didn't understand that.
For anyone who doesn't remember here are the four laws of thermodynamics: 0.) "If two thermodynamic systems are each in thermal equilibrium with a third, then they are in thermal equilibrium with each other." 1.) "In any process, the total energy remains constant." (aka: Energy nor matter can NOT be created nor destroyed) 2.) "The entropy of an isolated system not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a max value at equilibrium." 3.) "As temp approaches absolute zero, the entropy of a system approaches a constant." ---- The following questions I propose ( I only discussed with a few other people today) I came up with at about 4am yesterday morning. * Is infinity constant? (if not then why does this hold true: 1 + (infinity) = (infinity) * If the energy in the universe is constant; then where does matter and/or light energy inside a black hole go? * In relation to the last one... does the "universe" include all possible, and unseen, unnoticeable, and undiscovered dimensions? * If the energy in the universe is constant; (all matter that exists now has always existed, just in different forms) then doesn't that mean the universe is finite? * In relation to time, if you travel into the past, wouldn't you create an unbalance of energy in the past/future with your presence missing in the "then present" and now increased in the past? * The energy used in time travel; where would it "transfer" to, if it cannot be destroyed? * The grandfather paradox holds true due to the 1st law; if you grandfather died it causes an unbalance along the time line therefore, would destroy your mom or dad. If destroyed; (which is impossible due to law 1 as well) where would they go? * To build upon the law statement. If you kill your grandfather before your mother was born, she would be destroyed on the first time "line..." where would she go? * Light is energy. Where does light go when you turn off the switch? IT has to transfer to something else. Light emits heat only white lit, but what about when it's gone? * Is infinity prime or composite? * If there is a finite amount of energy in the universe, then infinity can't exist. You can't count higher than the total molecules that take up the universe. * Light has not mass, but has energy? (how... what about Engery = Mass * Light ^2) Remember I was half-awake when I coined this up... Enjoy -------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 21 2007, 07:17 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Venter ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 5-September 07 Member No.: 39 |
I'll throw my own thoughts into the mix.
* If the energy in the universe is constant; then where does matter and/or light energy inside a black hole go? Into the black hole, I presume. It is a hole in the sense of a cavity or a hollow. * In relation to the last one... does the "universe" include all possible, and unseen, unnoticeable, and undiscovered dimensions? That is just a question of words. "Universe" is a word created by humanity and we a free to define it as we choose. There is no intristic connection between it and the world itself. Answer: It does if we want it to. * If the energy in the universe is constant; (all matter that exists now has always existed, just in different forms) then doesn't that mean the universe is finite? Merely that matter/energy is. Although a finite universe doesn't sound impossible. * In relation to time, if you travel into the past, wouldn't you create an unbalance of energy in the past/future with your presence missing in the "then present" and now increased in the past? I believe that the first law of thermodynamics states: "In any process, the total energy of the universe remains constant." It doesn't say when in the universe the energy has to be. This of course presumes that time travel would be possible. * The energy used in time travel; where would it "transfer" to, if it cannot be destroyed? You need energy to time travel? I didn't know that. Maybe it works the same as travel through spatial dimension and becomes time-kinetic energy?* The grandfather paradox holds true due to the 1st law; if you grandfather died it causes an unbalance along the time line therefore, would destroy your mom or dad. If destroyed; (which is impossible due to law 1 as well) where would they go? Nobody said it has to be balanced across time any more than across space. * Light is energy. Where does light go when you turn off the switch? IT has to transfer to something else. Light emits heat only white lit, but what about when it's gone? It spreads out or is absorbed into matter. Just because you can't see light doesn't mean it isn't there, only that there isn't enough of it in the right spectrum. * If there is a finite amount of energy in the universe, then infinity can't exist. You can't count higher than the total molecules that take up the universe. Who said mathematics is bound by matter, or how far you can count? Even with an infinite amount of matter you could never count to infinity.* Light has not mass, but has energy? (how... what about Engery = Mass * Light ^2) Energy = mass * (speed of light)^2. Even though a photon has no mass, light has a relativistic mass in form of energy. It has momentum and can exert pressure.I always found the second law to be curiously vague. |
|
|
|
Sep 21 2007, 04:12 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Junior Venter ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 20-September 07 From: MOST BEAUTIFUL OREGON Member No.: 61 |
I was having a heated "debate" with a friend the other about the laws of thermodynamics. She kept stating that they always work therefore there is no one experiment needed to prove they work all the time. Then she started getting into the "if the opposite doesn't hold true, therefore it must work." Which I didn't understand that. For anyone who doesn't remember here are the four laws of thermodynamics: 0.) "If two thermodynamic systems are each in thermal equilibrium with a third, then they are in thermal equilibrium with each other." 1.) "In any process, the total energy remains constant." (aka: Energy nor matter can NOT be created nor destroyed) 2.) "The entropy of an isolated system not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a max value at equilibrium." 3.) "As temp approaches absolute zero, the entropy of a system approaches a constant." ---- The following questions I propose ( I only discussed with a few other people today) I came up with at about 4am yesterday morning. * Is infinity constant? (if not then why does this hold true: 1 + (infinity) = (infinity) * If the energy in the universe is constant; then where does matter and/or light energy inside a black hole go? * In relation to the last one... does the "universe" include all possible, and unseen, unnoticeable, and undiscovered dimensions? * If the energy in the universe is constant; (all matter that exists now has always existed, just in different forms) then doesn't that mean the universe is finite? * In relation to time, if you travel into the past, wouldn't you create an unbalance of energy in the past/future with your presence missing in the "then present" and now increased in the past? * The energy used in time travel; where would it "transfer" to, if it cannot be destroyed? * The grandfather paradox holds true due to the 1st law; if you grandfather died it causes an unbalance along the time line therefore, would destroy your mom or dad. If destroyed; (which is impossible due to law 1 as well) where would they go? * To build upon the law statement. If you kill your grandfather before your mother was born, she would be destroyed on the first time "line..." where would she go? * Light is energy. Where does light go when you turn off the switch? IT has to transfer to something else. Light emits heat only white lit, but what about when it's gone? * Is infinity prime or composite? * If there is a finite amount of energy in the universe, then infinity can't exist. You can't count higher than the total molecules that take up the universe. * Light has not mass, but has energy? (how... what about Engery = Mass * Light ^2) Remember I was half-awake when I coined this up... Enjoy you may find a lot of answers at the thunderbolt project, thunderbolts of the gods. http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB/phpBB2/index.php video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=47...lts+of+the+Gods |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2007, 10:05 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Advanced Venter ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 13-August 07 From: NEO Member No.: 14 |
Cool video, I started watching. I'm looking to finish it tonight.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 10 2007, 01:56 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Advanced Venter ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 174 Joined: 27-October 07 From: USA Member No.: 187 |
does the "universe" include all possible, and unseen, unnoticeable, and undiscovered dimensions?
Actually the term "multiverse" was coined to refer to all dimensions, or planes of existence. However, in this context, I would say yes, it would contain all dimensions. For instance, if energy moves to an alternate dimension, like, say a soul going to Valhalla, then in order to preserve conservation of energy Valhalla must count as part of the "Universe". The Big Bang theory, which explains the "universe", relies on energy from another dimension to set it off, like perhaps a tachyon moving backward in time from a possible future. -------------------- Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose.
|
|
|
|
Nov 10 2007, 11:36 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Junior Venter ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 10-November 07 Member No.: 222 |
Thermo dynamics, a heated topic
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
8 | yano | 372 | 25th September 2007 - 08:59 PM Last post by: yano |
|||
![]() |
3 | DSTM | 113 | 14th November 2007 - 10:47 AM Last post by: DSTM |
|||
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th September 2008 - 04:57 PM |