IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Welcome to ThoughtVent, a free community where you can talk to your peers about whatever you want. Using the site is easy and fun. Once registered, simply click on the category that fits your topic and click on the New Topic button to start talking with our other members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.
Click here to Register!




  Digg this topic · Save to del.icio.us · Slashdot It · Post to Technorati · Post to Furl · Submit to Reddit · Share on Facebook · Fark It · Googlize This Post · Add to ma.gnolia · Tag to Wink · Add to MyWeb · Add to Netscape
Reply to this topicStart new topic
NATO must prepare to launch pre-emptive nuclear attacks, Against the Geneva Convention and NATO Declaration
cuddleupnow
post Jan 26 2008, 09:11 AM
Post #1


Venter
**

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 26-January 08
From: Scotland UK
Member No.: 385



QUOTE
1.Pre-emptive war.
The United Nations was founded after World War Two, in the attempt to stop future wars and create a world body that would be able to peacefully resolve the conflicts among nations and peoples. Pre-emptive war as a form of self-defense is not permitted.


The US signed that declaration when they joined NATO yet here we are in danger of being forced into a situation we absolutely do NOT want to get into. Have any of these military advisors read their history and the effects of nuclear weapons as a whole? Look back at Hiroshima and Nagasaki please. Then look at the effects of a Nuclear power station leaking or malfunctioning and the fall out from that. The Chernobyl plant caused fallout damage right the way to the UK which effects lasted for years. Now think of the power in a nuclear weapon and the devastating effect the use of just one would have on the planet. Are our politicians and advisors really so dense that they can't see the destruction of human life as we know it is imminent if nuclear weapons were to be used? And why can't they learn from history and see that the more they threaten to use these weapons the more the opposition will arm against such a use and with that merely increase the chances of these weapons being used. If you're in an argument in the street and keep shouting at your opponent then it will escalate to such an extent that eventually someone will get hurt or even killed. If, however, we walk away from it or try to stay calm and relaxed with our opponent, then the situation would be diffused and a peaceful solution found. We may even leave as friends and allies. Being an ex- security officer I have been in situations like that many times and have never yet had to result to the use of physical force in any confrontation I had to deal with. So in my opinion it's better to stay cool, calm and look at things logically and rationally than to jump in with both feet and cause the situation to escalate to an unmanageable proportion. I know which I prefer.

This post has been edited by cuddleupnow: Jan 26 2008, 09:13 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No New Posts   9 -dc3- 328 8th October 2007 - 09:52 AM
Last post by: dc3
No New Posts   8 cuddleupnow 207 29th January 2008 - 07:18 AM
Last post by: cuddleupnow
No New Posts   7 DSTM 228 27th March 2008 - 12:04 PM
Last post by: no one
No New Posts   4 Vicki 137 13th June 2008 - 10:12 PM
Last post by: unjustjohn



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th December 2008 - 11:36 AM