spontaneity or stupidity?

The word spontaneous is used in everyday life, and often to reflect something positive. My understanding of spontaneity is where one act's on impusle, without much consideration and thought about what they are doing. Would it not be correct to refer to the quality of being spontaneous as being stupid and unconstructive?

Evolutionary Theory and the Mind Theory

The Evolutionary Theory is a theory. There is indirect evidence which would suggest that the theory is more likely than not, true. Furthermore, no one has provided an alternative and logical answer as to how human kind / life came into existance.

I have used the Evolutionary Theory (ET) as an example to put forward a strong case for the fact that the mind has intangible qualities (exists beyond time and space). No one has proved that thought process is something which is exclusively the product of chemical reactions within the mind. And there is much indirect evidence which proves that there are no limits to the imagination (or how the mind works), such evidence demonstrated by the rockets we send into space and by the mobile communications and technology we use today.

So on this basis, I would say that there just a strong case for the above mind theory as there is for ET. Anyone disagree?

Those who do not accept the Evolutionary Theory, please do not respond to this post.

Media, The "Reorganisation" of Religion?

Is Media the reorganisation of religion? Encapsulating and marketing the values we ought to possess and explaining history from its own perspective?

Bottled Water & UK Government

MP's have initiated an attack on bottled water as more water is used in the process of getting bottled water on to the shelves than the amount of water actually sold. Ken Livinstone for one has urged the public not to buy bottled water.

I am dissappointed that few can see through this rhetorical argument. People, as usual, are indoctrined by the media (just like organised religion indoctrinates people) and I'm sure that many people who don't think for themselves will now use tap water rather than bottled water, like some government departments now do.

What I do not understand is why this attack is being brought specifically on bottled water and not on products such as Coca Cola and lucozade, as there are many more reasons which justify not buying Coke than bottled water.

In light of the fact that bottle water is very popular nowadays, I can only infer that this attack on bottled water was initiated by fizzy drink manufacturers (i.e. schweppes) who quite possibly may be giving the government backhanders. On the other hand, it may have been an issue concerning the fact that government departments spend too much of tax payers money on bottled water, in which case the argument is justified. However, the argument has been extended beyond this limit by the media and MPs which makes the issue of why the argument has been put forward much more questionable.

People should buy more bottled water and less fizzy drinks!!!

Do you agree, if not, please state your reasons...

Another issue which puzzles me is that Schweppes manufactures bottled sparkling water, but when they introduced a brand of bottled water, it was found to be unfit for drinking and Schweppes were told to take the water back off the market. How can their sparkling water be safe for consumption, but their normal brand of bottled water unfit?

Capitalists and Religious Extremists

After all, both catagories of individuals are indoctrinated or susceptible to serving a purpose greater than themselves.